Contrivers Review Site Banner

The centenary of the Russian Revolution was the chance to reevaluate its controversial legacy. Even on the Left, it remains inseparable from Stalinism: “a tragedy at best.” But there is a Russian Revolution worth saving in the experiences of the people that lived through it.

Alain Badiou is one of Europe’s most prolific, important, and controversial thinkers. But in America, he is less well known. In a short, critical introduction, Mark GE Kelly explains why we should care about Badiou and the heroic age of Western philosophy.

A survey of reporting on the not-so-new gig econony: What’s it like to survive on piece-work? Are there any political solutions? Is a new working class identity forming out of these shared experiences?

President Trump’s lasting legacy may be a dysfunctional state, as institutional neglect and incompetence threaten longterm health of the US federal government.

Pete Sinnott, Jr. explores the recent controversies around protest, the decades-long stereotyping of protesters, and democratic voice.

Çağlar Köseoğlu interviews political theorist Davide Panagia about his concept of #datapolitik, the evolving relationship between humans and their algorithms, and the possibilities of resistance.

Wesley Bishop describes the history of union and social-justice activism at Purdue University and the current fight for union representation for graduate students at Purdue.

In a wide ranging interview, Jessica Lawless discusses her transition from adjunct professor to labor organizer, the labor movement in the era of Trump, and the difficult process of linking activism in higher education with a far-reaching movement for social justice.

How liberal politics reinforces racism in seven simple rules.

The party conventions in July staged for everyone to see that the Republican Party was not going into the 2016 election unified—what almost everyone missed was that a lack of unity would actually propel them to a win in November.

Martín Plot reflects on the way the 2016 US Presidential election has fundamentally altered how Americans experience and understand their political reality, especially the perception of our shared possibles futures.

Kurtz reminds supporters of Bernie Sanders of the “invisible” history of American socialism through a series of post-War texts. His hope is to rehabilitate this forgotten history, and to give Bernie supporters a common heritage for future organizing.

Kevin Watson and Michael O’Bryan discuss the goals of SEIU in organizing adjuncts as well as the structural and cultural challenges faced by faculty and universities alike.

From the emotional highs of the Gezi uprising, to the recent failed military coup, Çağlar Köseoğlu surveys recent articles about Turkey and Turkish democracy.

In an interview, David Frayne discusses his new book The Refusal of Work, the psychological and social costs of modern work, and the possibility of reform.

Sinnott explores the relationship between form, genre, and expression of ideas. He compares two examples of writing that exemplify the possibilities that emerge when we stop insisting dogmatically on genre conformity.

In our second installment, we explore two questions surrounding the presidential election: Where is Donald Trump’s support coming form? Is Donald Trump a fascist?

We inaugurate a new series with a discussion of two articles on the crisis in the Humanities.

Anyone attempting to shed light on the problem of adjunct or contingent teaching labor (as some prefer to be called) in the United States’s colleges and universities is fighting a lonely political battle with few allies and many opponents, both of whom have a stake in keeping this issue quiet.

We see a situation in which neoliberalism has driven us into a brick wall and people are trying to find a way to get out of it. Foucault offers conceptual tools to those who are trying to change the world. In our contemporary conjuncture, attempting to mobilize Foucault’s name to shore up neoliberalism is perverse.

Contrivers Review Brand Image